phpBB Forum
 
It is currently Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:51 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Hydro 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 6
STEAM_0:1:3977296
Post Hydro
Is terrible and when it comes on the majority of people leave since they didn't vote for it (unless accidently).

Would be nice to see it removed from the cycle.


Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:16 pm
Profile E-mail
HH Donor
HH Donor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:05 am
Posts: 1911
Location: Here.
STEAM_0:0:538759
MCID: Fluff_a_Licious
BattleTag: Netrahedon#2897
Post Re: Hydro
How can you accidently vote for something which is marked with a number of 4(or was it 5?) and upwards?

If you randomly push buttons..well, your fault?! :?

_________________


Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:25 pm
Profile E-mail
HH Donor
HH Donor

Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:55 pm
Posts: 296
STEAM_0:1:29119830
MCID: hemsk
Post Re: Hydro
Its definately a marmite map and while i'm a hater too, the simple fact it gets voted for is reason enough to keep it because some must like it.

I think though its more an issue with the voting system. You basically have 3 groups of people, CP5 lovers, PL lovers and weird map lovers. If all 3 come up as options then quite often a map can be voted in with a 30-35% win, which leaves the majority of people sad.

IMO, a map should require >50% to be played. Is it possible if, in the above situation of 3, 30% voted for, the top 2 go on to a further vote to ensure a 50% choice?

ie. vote goes like this -

1. Hydro - 33%
2. Dustbowl - 32%
3. Thundermountain - 31%
4. Mountainlab - 4%
5. Well - 0%

Then there would be a further vote between Hydro/Dustbowl.


Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:12 pm
Profile E-mail
HH Member
HH Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:20 pm
Posts: 3247
STEAM_0:1:17709863
BattleTag: pinion#2876
Post Re: Hydro
hydro is the 2nd best map after 2fort.


so no.

_________________


Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:14 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
HH Donor
HH Donor
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:44 pm
Posts: 3761
Location: Leicester, UK
STEAM_0:0:15279954
Post Re: Hydro
Quote:
IMO, a map should require >50% to be played. Is it possible if, in the above situation of 3, 30% voted for, the top 2 go on to a further vote to ensure a 50% choice?


That's what we have on the Saxton Hale server. However there might be some awkwardness with using the same plugin on the other servers, as it'd need to use info from the map rating system...


Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:14 pm
Profile E-mail WWW
HH Donor
HH Donor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 12:08 am
Posts: 6095
STEAM_0:0:16743808
MCID: frog
Post Re: Hydro
Hemsk wrote:
You basically have 3 groups of people, CP5 lovers, PL lovers and weird map lovers...

...Then there would be a further vote between Hydro/Dustbowl.
I'm not so sure that it's a simple as just those 3 groups. I'm sure there are many more and it's not so clear cut as you might think.

Soon enough there will be a map voting system that utilises the built-in TF2 VGUI voting system AND map ratings AND an option second round of voting. Until that time we'll just have to endure the trauma of being confronted with the occasional map that we don't like so much.

Hydro shouldn't be singled out for removal.


edit: such poor 'trolling' attempts by bfox


Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:24 pm
Profile E-mail
HH Donor
HH Donor
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 8:04 pm
Posts: 2815
STEAM_0:0:5277183
Post Re: Hydro
Hemsk wrote:
Its definately a marmite map and while i'm a hater too, the simple fact it gets voted for is reason enough to keep it because some must like it.

I think though its more an issue with the voting system. You basically have 3 groups of people, CP5 lovers, PL lovers and weird map lovers. If all 3 come up as options then quite often a map can be voted in with a 30-35% win, which leaves the majority of people sad.

IMO, a map should require >50% to be played. Is it possible if, in the above situation of 3, 30% voted for, the top 2 go on to a further vote to ensure a 50% choice?

ie. vote goes like this -

1. Hydro - 33%
2. Dustbowl - 32%
3. Thundermountain - 31%
4. Mountainlab - 4%
5. Well - 0%

Then there would be a further vote between Hydro/Dustbowl.


Haha if you can convince this to go through I want you to come to the UK and try and get Alternative vote (which is what this is) through, probably to complicated for a mapvote every match, sometimes people just want the dialogue box to go away (although I am a heavy supporter of AV :P)

_________________


Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:32 pm
Profile E-mail
HH Donor
HH Donor

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:35 am
Posts: 132
Location: zhe internetz
STEAM_0:0:18250562
Post Re: Hydro
Why is Hydro terrible? Was the first map I ever played on TF2 years ago and I still like it.
Better than some overplayed maps like badlands or gravelpit. Yeah, they're nice, but it's not a competitive game that we're having so we play only on one map. It gets BORING!!!
I vote for whatever I think won't win (like hydro in the case or dusbowl or whatever). I like to see new maps and not only the same. If I play 4 times badlands in a day (7-8 hours playing roughly) then it just gets repetitive and dull.
Imo it's not maps fault, it's players - they WANT to not like hydro so they don't like it. What is the problem of playing it like any other map? Your mindset (or whatever, idk if it's correctly used). Yesterday I was playing on 1 and server was half full to empty. Mapvote came in and I said to vote for dustbowl. People hate dustbowl, right? Yeah, but server got filled in minutes when it came. And it always is the same - dustbowl comes in, people come. And it's not the f2p 2, it's 1 - regulars came. Why is that? Every time it is a coinicidence or what?
Try to relax and have fun of the game. I don't feel comfortable if a certain map comes in (hate granary for example, and it's overplayed as well) but I don't leave when they come.

_________________


Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:58 pm
Profile E-mail
HH Member
HH Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 671
STEAM_0:0:16253862
Post Re: Hydro
How about making 2 votes? The second being about the two most topvoted maps, that way, the big majority will get the map they prefer.

The problem with Hydro is mainly that they are small maps and usually just ends with either steamroll or stalemates due to turtling.

_________________


Sun Aug 28, 2011 3:19 pm
Profile E-mail
HH Donor
HH Donor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:27 pm
Posts: 120
Location: Belgium
STEAM_0:0:26003725
Post Re: Hydro
Why not just have Badlands 24/7 ? Because if you raise the number of votes required, this will lead to the same few maps being played even more than it is already right now.

I'm not saying Badlands is the worst map around (though I'm not particularly fond of it) and I'm not saying Hydro is the greatest, but still I'd vote for Hydro when I get the choice between those 2. The reason is simple : variation. Badlands gets played way too much, and maps like Hydro hardly ever. It's even come to the point where I go to another server as soon as Badlands pops up again.

_________________


Sun Aug 28, 2011 3:47 pm
Profile E-mail
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.